Captum是PyTorch的模型可解释性和理解库。Captum在拉丁语中表示理解，包含PyTorch模型的集成梯度、显著图、平滑、vargrad等通用实现。它可以快速集成使用特定于领域的库(如torchvision、torchtext等)构建的模型。
https://github.com/pytorch/captum/blob/master/tutorials/Bert_SQUAD_Interpret.ipynb
Interpreting BERT Models (Part 1)
In this notebook we demonstrate how to interpret Bert models using Captum library. In this particular case study we focus on a fine-tuned Question Answering model on SQUAD dataset using transformers library from Hugging Face: https://huggingface.co/transformers/
We show how to use interpretation hooks to examine and better understand embeddings, sub-embeddings, bert, and attention layers.
Note: Before running this tutorial, please install seaborn, pandas and matplotlib, transformers(from hugging face, tested on transformer version 4.3.0.dev0) python packages.
在本笔记本中，我们演示了如何使用 Captum 库解释 Bert 模型。 在这个特殊的案例研究中，我们专注于使用 Hugging Face 的transformers库对 SQUAD 数据集进行微调的问答模型：https://huggingface.co/transformers/
我们展示了如何使用interpretation hooks来检查和更好地理解embeddings、sub-embeddings、bert 和attention层。
注意：在运行本教程之前，请安装seaborn、pandas 和matplotlib、transformers（来自hugging face，在transformer 版本4.3.0.dev0 上测试）python 包。
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import seaborn as sns
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
from transformers import BertTokenizer, BertForQuestionAnswering, BertConfig
from captum.attr import visualization as viz
from captum.attr import LayerConductance, LayerIntegratedGradients
device = torch.device("cuda:0" if torch.cuda.is_available() else "cpu")
The first step is to fine-tune BERT model on SQUAD dataset. This can be easiy accomplished by following the steps described in hugging face’s official web site: https://github.com/huggingface/transformers#run_squadpy-fine-tuning-on-squad-for-question-answering
Note that the fine-tuning is done on a bert-base-cased pre-trained model.
第一步是在 SQUAD 数据集上微调 BERT 模型。 这可以通过遵循hugging face官方网站中描述的步骤轻松完成：https://github.com/huggingface/transformers#run_squadpy-fine-tuning-on-squad-for-question-answering
请注意，微调是在bert-base-cased预训练模型上完成的。
After we pretrain the model, we can load the tokenizer and pre-trained BERT model using the commands described below.
在我们预训练模型之后，我们可以使用下面描述的命令加载tokenizer和预训练的 BERT 模型。
# replace <PATH-TO-SAVED-MODEL> with the real path of the saved model
model_path = 'deepset/bert-base-cased-squad2'
# load model
model = BertForQuestionAnswering.from_pretrained(model_path)
model.to(device)
model.eval()
model.zero_grad()
# load tokenizer
tokenizer = BertTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_path, do_lower_case=False)
A helper function to perform forward pass of the model and make predictions.
一个辅助函数，用于执行模型的前向传递并进行预测。
def predict(inputs, token_type_ids=None, position_ids=None, attention_mask=None):
output = model(inputs, token_type_ids=token_type_ids,
position_ids=position_ids, attention_mask=attention_mask, )
return output.start_logits, output.end_logits
Defining a custom forward function that will allow us to access the start and end postitions of our prediction using position input argument.
定义一个自定义forward函数，该函数允许我们使用 position 输入参数访问预测的开始和结束位置。
def squad_pos_forward_func(inputs, token_type_ids=None, position_ids=None, attention_mask=None, position=0):
pred = predict(inputs,
token_type_ids=token_type_ids,
position_ids=position_ids,
attention_mask=attention_mask)
pred = pred[position]
return pred.max(1).values
Let’s compute attributions with respect to the BertEmbeddings layer.
To do so, we need to define baselines / references, numericalize both the baselines and the inputs. We will define helper functions to achieve that.
The cell below defines numericalized special tokens that will be later used for constructing inputs and corresponding baselines/references.
让我们计算关于BertEmbeddings层的属性。
为此，我们需要定义baselines/references，将baselines和inputs数值化。 我们将定义辅助函数来实现这一点。
下面的单元格定义了数字化的special tokens，稍后将用于构建输入和相应的baselines/references。
ref_token_id = tokenizer.pad_token_id # A token used for generating token reference
sep_token_id = tokenizer.sep_token_id # A token used as a separator between question and text and it is also added to the end of the text.
cls_token_id = tokenizer.cls_token_id # A token used for prepending to the concatenated question-text word sequence
Below we define a set of helper function for constructing references / baselines for word tokens, token types and position ids. We also provide separate helper functions that allow to construct attention masks and bert embeddings both for input and reference.
下面我们定义了一组辅助函数，用于为word tokens、token types和position ids构建references/baselines。 我们还提供了单独的辅助函数，允许为input和reference构建attention masks和 bert embeddings。
def construct_input_ref_pair(question, text, ref_token_id, sep_token_id, cls_token_id):
question_ids = tokenizer.encode(question, add_special_tokens=False)
text_ids = tokenizer.encode(text, add_special_tokens=False)
# construct input token ids
input_ids = [cls_token_id] + question_ids + [sep_token_id] + text_ids + [sep_token_id]
# construct reference token ids
ref_input_ids = [cls_token_id] + [ref_token_id] * len(question_ids) + [sep_token_id] + \
[ref_token_id] * len(text_ids) + [sep_token_id]
return torch.tensor([input_ids], device=device), torch.tensor([ref_input_ids], device=device), len(question_ids)
def construct_input_ref_token_type_pair(input_ids, sep_ind=0):
seq_len = input_ids.size(1)
token_type_ids = torch.tensor([[0 if i <= sep_ind else 1 for i in range(seq_len)]], device=device)
ref_token_type_ids = torch.zeros_like(token_type_ids, device=device)# * -1
return token_type_ids, ref_token_type_ids
def construct_input_ref_pos_id_pair(input_ids):
seq_length = input_ids.size(1)
position_ids = torch.arange(seq_length, dtype=torch.long, device=device)
# we could potentially also use random permutation with `torch.randperm(seq_length, device=device)`
ref_position_ids = torch.zeros(seq_length, dtype=torch.long, device=device)
position_ids = position_ids.unsqueeze(0).expand_as(input_ids)
ref_position_ids = ref_position_ids.unsqueeze(0).expand_as(input_ids)
return position_ids, ref_position_ids
def construct_attention_mask(input_ids):
return torch.ones_like(input_ids)
def construct_whole_bert_embeddings(input_ids, ref_input_ids, \
token_type_ids=None, ref_token_type_ids=None, \
position_ids=None, ref_position_ids=None):
input_embeddings = model.bert.embeddings(input_ids, token_type_ids=token_type_ids, position_ids=position_ids)
ref_input_embeddings = model.bert.embeddings(ref_input_ids, token_type_ids=token_type_ids, position_ids=position_ids)
return input_embeddings, ref_input_embeddings
Let’s define the question - text pair that we’d like to use as an input for our Bert model and interpret what the model was forcusing on when predicting an answer to the question from given input text
让我们定义question-text对，我们希望将其用作 Bert 模型的输入，并在从给定的输入文本预测问题的答案时解释模型所强调的内容
question, text = "What is important to us?", "It is important to us to include, empower and support humans of all kinds."
Let’s numericalize the question, the input text and generate corresponding baselines / references for all three sub-embeddings (word, token type and position embeddings) types using our helper functions defined above.
让我们使用上面定义的辅助函数对问题、输入文本进行数值化，并为所有三个子嵌入（词、标记类型和位置嵌入）类型生成相应的基线/参考。
input_ids, ref_input_ids, sep_id = construct_input_ref_pair(question, text, ref_token_id, sep_token_id, cls_token_id)
token_type_ids, ref_token_type_ids = construct_input_ref_token_type_pair(input_ids, sep_id)
position_ids, ref_position_ids = construct_input_ref_pos_id_pair(input_ids)
attention_mask = construct_attention_mask(input_ids)
indices = input_ids[0].detach().tolist()
all_tokens = tokenizer.convert_ids_to_tokens(indices)
Also, let’s define the ground truth for prediction’s start and end positions.
此外，让我们为预测的开始和结束位置定义真实标签。
ground_truth = 'to include, empower and support humans of all kinds'
ground_truth_tokens = tokenizer.encode(ground_truth, add_special_tokens=False)
ground_truth_end_ind = indices.index(ground_truth_tokens[-1])
ground_truth_start_ind = ground_truth_end_ind - len(ground_truth_tokens) + 1
Now let’s make predictions using input, token type, position id and a default attention mask.
现在让我们使用input、token type、position id和默认的attention mask进行预测。
start_scores, end_scores = predict(input_ids, \
token_type_ids=token_type_ids, \
position_ids=position_ids, \
attention_mask=attention_mask)
print('Question: ', question)
print('Predicted Answer: ', ' '.join(all_tokens[torch.argmax(start_scores) : torch.argmax(end_scores)+1]))
Question: What is important to us?
Predicted Answer: to include , em ##power and support humans of all kinds
There are two different ways of computing the attributions for emebdding layers. One option is to use LayerIntegratedGradients and compute the attributions with respect to BertEmbedding. The second option is to use LayerIntegratedGradients for each word_embeddings, token_type_embeddings and position_embeddings and compute the attributions w.r.t each embedding vector.
有两种不同的方法可以计算emebdding layers的属性。 一种选择是使用 LayerIntegratedGradients 并计算关于 BertEmbedding 的属性。 第二个选项是对每个 word_embeddings、token_type_embeddings 和 position_embeddings 使用 LayerIntegratedGradients，并计算每个嵌入向量的属性。
lig = LayerIntegratedGradients(squad_pos_forward_func, model.bert.embeddings)
attributions_start, delta_start = lig.attribute(inputs=input_ids,
baselines=ref_input_ids,
additional_forward_args=(token_type_ids, position_ids, attention_mask, 0),
return_convergence_delta=True)
attributions_end, delta_end = lig.attribute(inputs=input_ids, baselines=ref_input_ids,
additional_forward_args=(token_type_ids, position_ids, attention_mask, 1),
return_convergence_delta=True)
A helper function to summarize attributions for each word token in the sequence.
一个辅助函数，用于提取序列中每个单词标记的属性。
def summarize_attributions(attributions):
attributions = attributions.sum(dim=-1).squeeze(0)
attributions = attributions / torch.norm(attributions)
return attributions
attributions_start_sum = summarize_attributions(attributions_start)
attributions_end_sum = summarize_attributions(attributions_end)
# storing couple samples in an array for visualization purposes
start_position_vis = viz.VisualizationDataRecord(
attributions_start_sum,
torch.max(torch.softmax(start_scores[0], dim=0)),
torch.argmax(start_scores),
torch.argmax(start_scores),
str(ground_truth_start_ind),
attributions_start_sum.sum(),
all_tokens,
delta_start)
end_position_vis = viz.VisualizationDataRecord(
attributions_end_sum,
torch.max(torch.softmax(end_scores[0], dim=0)),
torch.argmax(end_scores),
torch.argmax(end_scores),
str(ground_truth_end_ind),
attributions_end_sum.sum(),
all_tokens,
delta_end)
print('\033[1m', 'Visualizations For Start Position', '\033[0m')
viz.visualize_text([start_position_vis])
print('\033[1m', 'Visualizations For End Position', '\033[0m')
viz.visualize_text([end_position_vis])
From the results above we can tell that for predicting start position our model is focusing more on the question side. More specifically on the tokens what and important. It has also slight focus on the token sequence to us in the text side.
In contrast to that, for predicting end position, our model focuses more on the text side and has relative high attribution on the last end position token kinds.
从上面的结果我们可以看出，为了预测开始位置，我们的模型更多地关注问题方面。 更具体地说，关于tokens what和important。 它还略微关注文本侧的标记序列to us。
与此相反，对于预测结束位置，我们的模型更侧重于文本方面，并且对最后结束位置标记kinds具有相对较高的归因。
Multi-Embedding attribution
Now let’s look into the sub-embeddings of BerEmbeddings and try to understand the contributions and roles of each of them for both start and end predicted positions.
To do so, we will use LayerIntegratedGradients for all three layer: word_embeddings, token_type_embeddings and position_embeddings.
现在让我们看看BerEmbeddings的sub-embeddings，并尝试了解每个sub-embeddings对开始和结束预测位置的贡献和作用。
为此，我们将对所有三层使用LayerIntegratedGradients：word_embeddings、token_type_embeddings和position_embeddings。
Now let’s create an instance of LayerIntegratedGradients and compute the attributions with respect to all those embeddings both for the start and end positions and summarize them for each word token.
现在让我们创建一个 LayerIntegratedGradients 的实例，并计算所有这些嵌入的开始和结束位置的属性，并为每个单词标记总结它们。
lig2 = LayerIntegratedGradients(squad_pos_forward_func, \
[model.bert.embeddings.word_embeddings, \
model.bert.embeddings.token_type_embeddings, \
model.bert.embeddings.position_embeddings])
attributions_start = lig2.attribute(inputs=(input_ids, token_type_ids, position_ids),
baselines=(ref_input_ids, ref_token_type_ids, ref_position_ids),
additional_forward_args=(attention_mask, 0))
attributions_end = lig2.attribute(inputs=(input_ids, token_type_ids, position_ids),
baselines=(ref_input_ids, ref_token_type_ids, ref_position_ids),
additional_forward_args=(attention_mask, 1))
attributions_start_word = summarize_attributions(attributions_start[0])
attributions_end_word = summarize_attributions(attributions_end[0])
attributions_start_token_type = summarize_attributions(attributions_start[1])
attributions_end_token_type = summarize_attributions(attributions_end[1])
attributions_start_position = summarize_attributions(attributions_start[2])
attributions_end_position = summarize_attributions(attributions_end[2])
/usr/local/lib/python3.8/dist-packages/captum/attr/_core/layer/layer_integrated_gradients.py:103: UserWarning: Multiple layers provided. Please ensure that each layer is**not** solely solely dependent on the outputs ofanother layer. Please refer to the documentation for moredetail.
warnings.warn(
An auxilary function that will help us to compute topk attributions and corresponding indices
一个辅助函数，将帮助我们计算 topk 属性和相应的索引
def get_topk_attributed_tokens(attrs, k=5):
values, indices = torch.topk(attrs, k)
top_tokens = [all_tokens[idx] for idx in indices]
return top_tokens, values, indices
Removing interpretation hooks from all layers after finishing attribution.
完成attribution后，从所有层中删除interpretation hooks。
Computing topk attributions for all sub-embeddings and placing them in pandas dataframes for better visualization.
计算所有sub-embeddings的 topk 属性并将它们放置在 Pandas 数据框中以获得更好的可视化。
top_words_start, top_words_val_start, top_word_ind_start = get_topk_attributed_tokens(attributions_start_word)
top_words_end, top_words_val_end, top_words_ind_end = get_topk_attributed_tokens(attributions_end_word)
top_token_type_start, top_token_type_val_start, top_token_type_ind_start = get_topk_attributed_tokens(attributions_start_token_type)
top_token_type_end, top_token_type_val_end, top_token_type_ind_end = get_topk_attributed_tokens(attributions_end_token_type)
top_pos_start, top_pos_val_start, pos_ind_start = get_topk_attributed_tokens(attributions_start_position)
top_pos_end, top_pos_val_end, pos_ind_end = get_topk_attributed_tokens(attributions_end_position)
df_start = pd.DataFrame({'Word(Index), Attribution': ["{} ({}), {}".format(word, pos, round(val.item(),2)) for word, pos, val in zip(top_words_start, top_word_ind_start, top_words_val_start)],
'Token Type(Index), Attribution': ["{} ({}), {}".format(ttype, pos, round(val.item(),2)) for ttype, pos, val in zip(top_token_type_start, top_token_type_ind_start, top_words_val_start)],
'Position(Index), Attribution': ["{} ({}), {}".format(position, pos, round(val.item(),2)) for position, pos, val in zip(top_pos_start, pos_ind_start, top_pos_val_start)]})
df_start.style.apply(['cell_ids: False'])
df_end = pd.DataFrame({'Word(Index), Attribution': ["{} ({}), {}".format(word, pos, round(val.item(),2)) for word, pos, val in zip(top_words_end, top_words_ind_end, top_words_val_end)],
'Token Type(Index), Attribution': ["{} ({}), {}".format(ttype, pos, round(val.item(),2)) for ttype, pos, val in zip(top_token_type_end, top_token_type_ind_end, top_words_val_end)],
'Position(Index), Attribution': ["{} ({}), {}".format(position, pos, round(val.item(),2)) for position, pos, val in zip(top_pos_end, pos_ind_end, top_pos_val_end)]})
df_end.style.apply(['cell_ids: False'])
['{}({})'.format(token, str(i)) for i, token in enumerate(all_tokens)]
['[CLS](0)',
'What(1)',
'is(2)',
'important(3)',
'to(4)',
'us(5)',
'?(6)',
'[SEP](7)',
'It(8)',
'is(9)',
'important(10)',
'to(11)',
'us(12)',
'to(13)',
'include(14)',
',(15)',
'em(16)',
'##power(17)',
'and(18)',
'support(19)',
'humans(20)',
'of(21)',
'all(22)',
'kinds(23)',
'.(24)',
'[SEP](25)']
Below we can see top 5 attribution results from all three embedding types in predicting start positions.
下面我们可以看到所有三种嵌入类型在预测起始位置时的前 5 个归因结果。
Top 5 attributed embeddings for start position
Word embeddings help to focus more on the surrounding tokens of the predicted answer’s start position to such as em, ##power and ,. It also has high attribution for the tokens in the question such as what and ?.
In contrast to to word embedding, token embedding type focuses more on the tokens in the text part such as important,em and start token to.
Position embedding also has high attribution score for the tokens surrounding to such as us and important. In addition to that, similar to word embedding we observe important tokens from the question.
We can perform similar analysis, and visualize top 5 attributed tokens for all three embedding types, also for the end position prediction.
词嵌入有助于更多地关注预测答案的起始位置的周围标记，例如 em、##power 和 ,。 它对问题中的令牌也有很高的归因，例如什么和？。
与词嵌入相比，标记嵌入类型更关注文本部分中的标记，例如important,em 和start token to。
位置嵌入对于诸如 us 和 important 之类的标记也具有很高的归因分数。 除此之外，与词嵌入类似，我们从问题中观察到重要的标记。
我们可以执行类似的分析，并将所有三种嵌入类型的前 5 个属性标记可视化，也可以用于结束位置预测。
Top 5 attributed embeddings for end position
It is interesting to observe high concentration of highly attributed tokens such as of, kinds, support and ##power for end position prediction.
The token kinds, which is the correct predicted token appears to have high attribution score both according word and position embeddings.
观察高度集中的高属性标记（例如用于结束位置预测的of、kinds, support 和 ##power）很有趣。
根据词嵌入和位置嵌入，作为正确预测的token，kinds似乎具有较高的属性得分。
Interpreting Bert Layers
Now let’s look into the layers of our network. More specifically we would like to look into the distribution of attribution scores for each token across all layers in Bert model and dive deeper into specific tokens.
We do that using one of layer attribution algorithms, namely, layer conductance. However, we encourage you to try out and compare the results with other algorithms as well.
现在让我们看看我们的网络层。 更具体地说，我们希望研究 Bert 模型中所有层中每个token的归因分数分布，并深入研究特定的tokens。
我们使用层归因算法之一来做到这一点，即layer conductance。 但是，我们鼓励您尝试并将结果与其他算法进行比较。
Let’s define another version of squad forward function that takes emebddings as input argument. This is necessary for LayerConductance algorithm.
让我们定义另一个版本的forward函数，它将emebddings作为输入参数。 这对于LayerConductance算法是必要的。
def squad_pos_forward_func2(input_emb, attention_mask=None, position=0):
pred = model(inputs_embeds=input_emb, attention_mask=attention_mask, )
pred = pred[position]
return pred.max(1).values
Let’s iterate over all layers and compute the attributions for all tokens. In addition to that let’s also choose a specific token that we would like to examine in detail, specified by an id token_to_explain and store related information in a separate array.
Note: Since below code is iterating over all layers it can take over 5 seconds. Please be patient!
让我们迭代所有层并计算所有tokens的属性。 除此之外，让我们还选择一个我们想要详细检查的特定token，由 id token_to_explain 指定，并将相关信息存储在单独的数组中。
注意：由于下面的代码迭代所有层，因此可能需要 5 秒以上。 请耐心等待！
layer_attrs_start = []
layer_attrs_end = []
# The token that we would like to examine separately.
token_to_explain = 23 # the index of the token that we would like to examine more thoroughly
layer_attrs_start_dist = []
layer_attrs_end_dist = []
input_embeddings, ref_input_embeddings = construct_whole_bert_embeddings(input_ids, ref_input_ids, \
token_type_ids=token_type_ids, ref_token_type_ids=ref_token_type_ids, \
position_ids=position_ids, ref_position_ids=ref_position_ids)
for i in range(model.config.num_hidden_layers):
lc = LayerConductance(squad_pos_forward_func2, model.bert.encoder.layer[i])
layer_attributions_start = lc.attribute(inputs=input_embeddings, baselines=ref_input_embeddings, additional_forward_args=(attention_mask, 0))
layer_attributions_end = lc.attribute(inputs=input_embeddings, baselines=ref_input_embeddings, additional_forward_args=(attention_mask, 1))
layer_attrs_start.append(summarize_attributions(layer_attributions_start).cpu().detach().tolist())
layer_attrs_end.append(summarize_attributions(layer_attributions_end).cpu().detach().tolist())
# storing attributions of the token id that we would like to examine in more detail in token_to_explain
layer_attrs_start_dist.append(layer_attributions_start[0,token_to_explain,:].cpu().detach().tolist())
layer_attrs_end_dist.append(layer_attributions_end[0,token_to_explain,:].cpu().detach().tolist())
The plot below represents a heat map of attributions across all layers and tokens for the start position prediction.
It is interesting to observe that the question word what gains increasingly high attribution from layer one to nine. In the last three layers that importance is slowly diminishing.
In contrary to what token, many other tokens have negative or close to zero attribution in the first 6 layers.
We start seeing slightly higher attribution in tokens important, us and to. Interestingly token em is also assigned high attribution score which is remarkably high the last three layers.
And lastly, our correctly predicted token to for the start position gains increasingly positive attribution has relatively high attribution especially in the last two layers.
下图代表了开始位置预测的所有层和标记的属性热图。
有趣的是，问题词what从第一层到第九层获得越来越高的归因。 在最后三层中，重要性正在慢慢降低。
与what令牌相反，许多其他令牌在前 6 层中具有负面或接近于零的属性。
我们开始看到标记important、us和to的归因略高。 有趣的是，标记em也被分配了高归因分数，这在最后三层非常高。
最后，我们正确预测的标记to的起始位置增益越来越积极的归因具有相对较高的归因，尤其是在最后两层。
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(15,5))
xticklabels=all_tokens
yticklabels=list(range(1,13))
ax = sns.heatmap(np.array(layer_attrs_start), xticklabels=xticklabels, yticklabels=yticklabels, linewidth=0.2)
plt.xlabel('Tokens')
plt.ylabel('Layers')
plt.show()
Now let’s examine the heat map of the attributions for the end position prediction. In the case of end position prediction we again observe high attribution scores for the token what in the last 11 layers.
The correctly predicted end token kinds has positive attribution across all layers and it is especially prominent in the last two layers.
现在让我们检查结束位置预测的属性热图。 在结束位置预测的情况下，我们再次观察到标记what在最后 11 层中的高归因分数。
正确预测的结束标记kinds在所有层中都具有正属性，并且在最后两层中尤为突出。
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(15,5))
xticklabels=all_tokens
yticklabels=list(range(1,13))
ax = sns.heatmap(np.array(layer_attrs_end), xticklabels=xticklabels, yticklabels=yticklabels, linewidth=0.2) #, annot=True
plt.xlabel('Tokens')
plt.ylabel('Layers')
plt.show()
It is interesting to note that when we compare the heat maps of start and end position, overall the colors for start position prediction on the map have darker intensities. This implies that there are less tokens that attribute positively to the start position prediction and there are more tokens which are negative indicators or signals of start position prediction.
有趣的是，当我们比较开始和结束位置的热图时，总体上地图上开始位置预测的颜色具有更暗的强度。 这意味着正面归因于开始位置预测的tokens较少，而作为开始位置预测的负面指标或信号的tokens较多。
Now let’s dig deeper into specific tokens and look into the distribution of attributions per layer for the token kinds in the start and end positions. The box plot diagram below shows the presence of outliers especially in the first four layers and in layer 8. We also observe that for start position prediction interquartile range slowly decreases as we go deeper into the layers and finally it is dimishing.
现在让我们深入研究特定的标记，并查看每层在开始和结束位置的标记 kinds 的属性分布。 下面的箱线图显示了异常值的存在，尤其是在前四层和第 8 层。我们还观察到，开始位置预测的四分位间距随着我们深入层而缓慢减小，最后逐渐减小。
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(20,10))
ax = sns.boxplot(data=layer_attrs_start_dist)
plt.xlabel('Layers')
plt.ylabel('Attribution')
plt.show()
Now let’s plot same distribution but for the prediction of the end position. Here attribution has larger positive values across all layers and the interquartile range doesn’t change much when moving deeper into the layers.
现在让我们绘制相同的分布，但用于预测结束位置。 在这里，归因在所有层中都有更大的正值，当深入到层中时，四分位距变化不大。
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(20,10))
ax = sns.boxplot(data=layer_attrs_end_dist)
plt.xlabel('Layers')
plt.ylabel('Attribution')
plt.show()
In addition to that we can also look into the distribution of attributions in each layer for any input token. This will help us to better understand and compare the distributional patterns of attributions across multiple layers. We can for example represent attributions as a probability density function (pdf) and compute the entropy of it in order to estimate the entropy of attributions in each layer. This can be easily computed using a histogram.
除此之外，我们还可以查看任何输入令牌在每一层中的属性分布。 这将帮助我们更好地理解和比较跨多个层的归因分布模式。 例如，我们可以将属性表示为概率密度函数 (pdf) 并计算它的熵以估计每一层中属性的熵。 这可以使用直方图轻松计算。
def pdf_attr(attrs, bins=100):
return np.histogram(attrs, bins=bins, density=True)[0]
In this particular case let’s compute the pdf for the attributions at end positions kinds. We can however do it for all tokens.
We will compute and visualize the pdfs and entropies using Shannon’s Entropy measure for each layer for token kinds.
在这种特殊情况下，让我们计算结束位置kinds的属性的 pdf。 但是，我们可以为所有令牌执行此操作。
我们将使用香农的熵度量来计算和可视化 pdf 和熵，用于标记kinds的每一层。
layer_attrs_end_pdf = map(lambda layer_attrs_end_dist: pdf_attr(layer_attrs_end_dist), layer_attrs_end_dist)
layer_attrs_end_pdf = np.array(list(layer_attrs_end_pdf))
# summing attribution along embedding diemension for each layer
# size: #layers
attr_sum = np.array(layer_attrs_end_dist).sum(-1)
# size: #layers
layer_attrs_end_pdf_norm = np.linalg.norm(layer_attrs_end_pdf, axis=-1, ord=1)
#size: #bins x #layers
layer_attrs_end_pdf = np.transpose(layer_attrs_end_pdf)
#size: #bins x #layers
layer_attrs_end_pdf = np.divide(layer_attrs_end_pdf, layer_attrs_end_pdf_norm, where=layer_attrs_end_pdf_norm!=0)
The plot below visualizes the probability mass function (pmf) of attributions for each layer for the end position token kinds. From the plot we can observe that the distributions are taking bell-curved shapes with different means and variances.
We can now use attribution pdfs to compute entropies in the next cell.
下图显示了终端位置标记kinds的每一层属性的概率质量函数 (pmf)。 从图中我们可以观察到分布呈钟形曲线，具有不同的均值和方差。
我们现在可以使用归因 pdf 来计算下一个单元格中的熵。
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(20,10))
plt.plot(layer_attrs_end_pdf)
plt.xlabel('Bins')
plt.ylabel('Density')
plt.legend(['Layer '+ str(i) for i in range(1,13)])
plt.show()
Below we calculate and visualize attribution entropies based on Shannon entropy measure where the x-axis corresponds to the number of layers and the y-axis corresponds to the total attribution in that layer. The size of the circles for each (layer, total_attribution) pair correspond to the normalized entropy value at that point.
In this particular example, we observe that the entropy doesn’t change much from layer to layer, however in a general case entropy can provide us an intuition about the distributional characteristics of attributions in each layer and can be useful especially when comparing it across multiple tokens.
下面我们基于Shannon熵度量计算和可视化属性熵，其中x轴对应层数，y轴对应该层的总属性。每个(layer, total_attribution)对的圆的大小对应于该点的归一化熵值。
在这个特定的例子中，我们观察到，熵在每一层之间变化不大，但是在一般情况下，熵可以为我们提供关于属性在每一层的分布特征的直观认识，尤其是在跨多个标记进行比较时，熵非常有用。
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(20,10))
# replacing 0s with 1s. np.log(1) = 0 and np.log(0) = -inf
layer_attrs_end_pdf[layer_attrs_end_pdf == 0] = 1
layer_attrs_end_pdf_log = np.log2(layer_attrs_end_pdf)
# size: #layers
entropies= -(layer_attrs_end_pdf * layer_attrs_end_pdf_log).sum(0)
plt.scatter(np.arange(12), attr_sum, s=entropies * 100)
plt.xlabel('Layers')
plt.ylabel('Total Attribution')
plt.show()
In the Part 2 of this tutorial we will to go deeper into attention layers, heads and compare the attributions with the attention weight matrices, study and discuss related statistics.
在本教程的第2部分中，我们将深入研究注意力层、头部，并将其属性与注意力权重矩阵进行比较，学习和讨论相关的统计数据。
Transformers: State-of-the-art Natural Language Processing for Pytorch, TensorFlow, and JAX.
1，我好不容易删除了，已经扣了我几百多rmb了，太坑了